Thanks Chimpmad I'll try.
The trouble is (and I'm bearing my heart here) I have enjoyed things in the past but then as soon as I know that the piece I liked and admired was worthless and of little value I stopped liking it. Call it shallowness on my part but the more I thought the more I realised its like knowing people really. The other thing is it always surprises me how something seemingly rubbish can be called art by others. Maybe I'm just a pottery fashion victim 
Regards
Mark
This is just a personal view but I've never really understood why so often the name is considered so much more important than the piece. How often on programmes such as 'The Antiques Roadshow' do we hear an expert say something along the lines of "At first glance this appears to be a run-of-the-mill, mundane item, but on turning it over and seeing the magic name of........ we start to see it in an altogether new light" or "This is a beautiful piece which, if it could be attriuted to....... would be worth a lot of money, but as an unsigned piece would fetch in the low tens of pounds"?
WHY

Surely a mundane piece is still mundane whatever name is attached, just as a beautiful piece is no less so for the omission of a good name.
My advice would be; If you're buying for investment then buy a 'named' piece, but if you're buying for pleasure then buy what you like.